It's not TV per se

Comments

[this is good]
Who are the looney tunes? j/k. My point exactly.
Well, I think this all boils down to one thing: getting old. Each generation looks at the next generation's art, music, and entertainment and says, "How sad. They don't have anything good. It's all crap." (c.f. MUSIC: Jonas Brothers, Kelly Clarkson, Eminem, Pearl Jam, Nirvana, Metallica, Led Zeppelin, Jimi Hendrix, The Who, Rolling Stones, The Beatles, the entirety of Jazz, etc.; TV: South Park, Jack Ass, The Simpsons, Friends, Seinfeld, Fresh Prince of Bel-Air, Married...with Children, Three's Company, Alf, Taxi, Soap, Leave it to Beaver, etc.)

Looney Tunes is an oddity in that it has served 4+ generations, the first of which was already in adulthood. But maybe that's precisely why Looney Tunes has survived these many generations: they were written for adult audiences at time when social morays most closely resembled what each subsequent generation has considered to be age-appropriate for their children. Plus, they were multi-layered in a way that stuff written specifically for kids can't really be---the kids don't get subtlety, but they do get the slap-stick. The only 'fly in the ointment' for the continued appreciation is the violence issue, but that's a whole different can of worms.

The thing to keep in mind is that kids have lower expectations of (what we, in our adulthood call) quality. The cloud of nostalgia softens the rough edges and makes us look back at Masters of the Universe and The Centurions and The Thundercats and think, "See, that was quality!" I can assure you it is only nostalgia that lets me believe Hawk the Slayer was a great fantasy movie. (Glowing Superballs(tm)! Look out!!!)

Post a comment

Already a Vox member? Sign in